It can not be a myth and what proof one need to understand that some national beliefs are so radical that they creep in into the brains of every citizen of that country who more or less belongs to the same religion. 'War on terror' was not unnecessarily aimed at Afghanistan or Iraq. The principles that made it instantly absorbed by millions around the world clearly is a proof that terrorism has something to do with nationality and religion.

Terrorism knows no religion. Show meone religion that endorses terrorism. When I say that I mean 100% followers of that religion should be endorsing terrorism. People at helm of affairs of a particular religion may encourage terrorism. But, they cease to represent that religion when they do that because they can never claim the support of the entire followers of that religion.

The Oxford English dictionary defines terrorists as one individual, or a group thereof, beleving common doctrine spuerceding definition in either secular or theological terms).

Terrorism and those terrorists practicing terror possess inherent qualaties superceding characterization by: nationalization, ethnicity, theology, etc..

It is basic binary logic that the majority of qualatative defining characteristics shared of ”terrorists” include Islam say, generally speaking, there are many other terorist groups i.e., Irish Republican Army etc. So, using this logic it is logically incorrect to define ’all’ terrorists by: nationality, religion and similar terms.

ALthough, it is true many of them derrive from certain cultural groups, but it is wrong to overgeneralize and demonize any particular sector of society in this manner because it is NOT true all of any religion nationality conforms to terorism.