
Smoking signifies freedom of the individual to make ones choices in a free society, be it a common man or a possible future President of the United States of America. Obama may not be the first Presidential candidate who smoked, but he has potential to become one of the most influential one in this century. In an increasingly media sensitive environment, his smoking in public did not go down easy. Lest gains made by the decades old anti-smoking campaign end up in smoke, public opinion forced Obama amidst the election campaign to announce kicking the butt. The worried health professionals and anti smoking campaigners breathe easy but the message remains that a presidential candidate promising ‘change’ could end up becoming an icon for millions of youngsters who may take to smoking in his steps.
Even though you have stamped your agreement with the argument extended but the comments added place you in-between.
If the image of a smoking dog (clearly depicting a Presidential candidate in this article) is acceptable to the general public (read: the ones sharing their valuable views in this debate) then a smoking Prez or Presidential candidate (in public) should not attract raised eyebrows by anyone.
Or... is that Presidential candidate, err, dog in the above picture smoking in its private cabin?? Forgive me, if I have interpreted the picture wrongly.
But anyway, I’m against the idea of curbing anyone’s freedom of choice, be it a Presidential candidate or a dog.
Local Opinions (4)
Global Opinions (6)
Of course it can have some bad repercussions, but what doesn’t have
If the image of a smoking dog (clearly depicting a Presidential candidate in this article) is acceptable to the general public (read: the ones sharing their valuable views in this debate) then a smoking Prez or Presidential candidate (in public) should not attract raised eyebrows by anyone.
Or... is that Presidential candidate, err, dog in the above picture smoking in its private cabin?? Forgive me, if I have interpreted the picture wrongly.
But anyway, I’m against the idea of curbing anyone’s freedom of choice, be it a Presidential candidate or a dog.
Even though you have stamped your agreement with the argument extended but the comments added place you in-between.
Of course it can have some bad repercussions, but what doesn’t have
If the image of a smoking dog (clearly depicting a Presidential candidate in this article) is acceptable to the general public (read: the ones sharing their valuable views in this debate) then a smoking Prez or Presidential candidate (in public) should not attract raised eyebrows by anyone.
Or... is that Presidential candidate, err, dog in the above picture smoking in its private cabin?? Forgive me, if I have interpreted the picture wrongly.
But anyway, I’m against the idea of curbing anyone’s freedom of choice, be it a Presidential candidate or a dog.
Even though you have stamped your agreement with the argument extended but the comments added place you in-between.
Home


RSS 














Of course it can have some bad repercussions, but what doesn’t have