Naina Devi stampede: Are the temple authorities responsible?
8 Star it
View Point , Shimla:
Aug 4 2008
Made Popular Aug 4 2008
A landslide rumor following a rain shelter collapse led to a deadly stampede in Naina Devi temple, Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh killing at least 140 people on Sunday. Around 25,000 devotees gathered to celebrate the annual nine holy days of the monsoon season.
Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
1 Stars
Disagree
Dayasurabhi Balaji
dhimati.blogspot.com..
Aug 4 2008
Pune,
India
They are not the only ones to blame.
Comment Link
1 Stars
Disagree
No way! We can’t blame the herdsman for the stupidity of his herd.
The temple authorities can’t keep a check on this foolish behavior of pilgrims, even if they wished to. It is upto the pilgrims to use their brains in such situations.
Instead of panicking, they should keep their cool and try to get a clear picture...before behaving like scared sheeps and killing each other.
The temple authorities can’t keep a check on this foolish behavior of pilgrims, even if they wished to. It is upto the pilgrims to use their brains in such situations.
Instead of panicking, they should keep their cool and try to get a clear picture...before behaving like scared sheeps and killing each other.
1 Stars
Agree
There is no doubt that the temple authorities are responsible for the tragedy. On a particularly rush day they should have let smaller batches to climb at once maintaining safe distance between one batch and the other. The full blame lies with the temple authorities.
1 Stars
Agree
@Aneez...
No way the people can be blamed for their own death. I am not convinced by some of the arguments here. Yes, the shepherd has to be blamed if he cannot keep the herd in control. But the stampede was caused by a rumour because there were humans involved and not animals. And how would you explain the snapping of the railing protecting the people from the cliff?
No way the people can be blamed for their own death. I am not convinced by some of the arguments here. Yes, the shepherd has to be blamed if he cannot keep the herd in control. But the stampede was caused by a rumour because there were humans involved and not animals. And how would you explain the snapping of the railing protecting the people from the cliff?
Local Opinions (4)
1 Stars
Disagree
They are not the only ones to blame.
1 Stars
Disagree
No way! We can’t blame the herdsman for the stupidity of his herd.
The temple authorities can’t keep a check on this foolish behavior of pilgrims, even if they wished to. It is upto the pilgrims to use their brains in such situations.
Instead of panicking, they should keep their cool and try to get a clear picture...before behaving like scared sheeps and killing each other.
The temple authorities can’t keep a check on this foolish behavior of pilgrims, even if they wished to. It is upto the pilgrims to use their brains in such situations.
Instead of panicking, they should keep their cool and try to get a clear picture...before behaving like scared sheeps and killing each other.
1 Stars
Agree
There is no doubt that the temple authorities are responsible for the tragedy. On a particularly rush day they should have let smaller batches to climb at once maintaining safe distance between one batch and the other. The full blame lies with the temple authorities.
1 Stars
Agree
@Aneez...
No way the people can be blamed for their own death. I am not convinced by some of the arguments here. Yes, the shepherd has to be blamed if he cannot keep the herd in control. But the stampede was caused by a rumour because there were humans involved and not animals. And how would you explain the snapping of the railing protecting the people from the cliff?
No way the people can be blamed for their own death. I am not convinced by some of the arguments here. Yes, the shepherd has to be blamed if he cannot keep the herd in control. But the stampede was caused by a rumour because there were humans involved and not animals. And how would you explain the snapping of the railing protecting the people from the cliff?
Global Opinions (4)
1 Stars
Disagree
They are not the only ones to blame.
1 Stars
Disagree
No way! We can’t blame the herdsman for the stupidity of his herd.
The temple authorities can’t keep a check on this foolish behavior of pilgrims, even if they wished to. It is upto the pilgrims to use their brains in such situations.
Instead of panicking, they should keep their cool and try to get a clear picture...before behaving like scared sheeps and killing each other.
The temple authorities can’t keep a check on this foolish behavior of pilgrims, even if they wished to. It is upto the pilgrims to use their brains in such situations.
Instead of panicking, they should keep their cool and try to get a clear picture...before behaving like scared sheeps and killing each other.
1 Stars
Agree
There is no doubt that the temple authorities are responsible for the tragedy. On a particularly rush day they should have let smaller batches to climb at once maintaining safe distance between one batch and the other. The full blame lies with the temple authorities.
1 Stars
Agree
@Aneez...
No way the people can be blamed for their own death. I am not convinced by some of the arguments here. Yes, the shepherd has to be blamed if he cannot keep the herd in control. But the stampede was caused by a rumour because there were humans involved and not animals. And how would you explain the snapping of the railing protecting the people from the cliff?
No way the people can be blamed for their own death. I am not convinced by some of the arguments here. Yes, the shepherd has to be blamed if he cannot keep the herd in control. But the stampede was caused by a rumour because there were humans involved and not animals. And how would you explain the snapping of the railing protecting the people from the cliff?
Agree (2)
1 Stars
There is no doubt that the temple authorities are responsible for the tragedy. On a particularly rush day they should have let smaller batches to climb at once maintaining safe distance between one batch and the other. The full blame lies with the temple authorities.
1 Stars
@Aneez...
No way the people can be blamed for their own death. I am not convinced by some of the arguments here. Yes, the shepherd has to be blamed if he cannot keep the herd in control. But the stampede was caused by a rumour because there were humans involved and not animals. And how would you explain the snapping of the railing protecting the people from the cliff?
No way the people can be blamed for their own death. I am not convinced by some of the arguments here. Yes, the shepherd has to be blamed if he cannot keep the herd in control. But the stampede was caused by a rumour because there were humans involved and not animals. And how would you explain the snapping of the railing protecting the people from the cliff?
Disagree (2)
1 Stars
They are not the only ones to blame.
1 Stars
No way! We can’t blame the herdsman for the stupidity of his herd.
The temple authorities can’t keep a check on this foolish behavior of pilgrims, even if they wished to. It is upto the pilgrims to use their brains in such situations.
Instead of panicking, they should keep their cool and try to get a clear picture...before behaving like scared sheeps and killing each other.
The temple authorities can’t keep a check on this foolish behavior of pilgrims, even if they wished to. It is upto the pilgrims to use their brains in such situations.
Instead of panicking, they should keep their cool and try to get a clear picture...before behaving like scared sheeps and killing each other.
Add your Comment
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 






