Is increase in life expectancy a boon for society?
View Point , Shimla:
Jun 12 2008
Made Popular Jun 12 2008

U.S. life expectancy hit a record high of 78.1 years in 2006. Death rates owing to top 14 causes too fell, according to a report issued by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Infant mortality too witnessed a sharp decline. The year saw a considerable fall in mortality rates in almost all the leading causes of death, including heart disease, cancer, accidents and diabetes.
Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry, no media found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
2 Stars
Disagree
Nishi Roy
Jun 12 2008
Bangalore,
India
It is a bane...look at Finland today. The Finnish labor force is expected to begin declining by 2010. In 2015, about 20 per cent of Finns will be aged 65 or older, and this is one of the major reasons why the Finnish goverment is opening up its doors to foreign workers.
Comment Link
(Global Perspectives)
2 Stars
Manishkumar
Jun 12 2008
Kottayam,
India
well it may seem the result of scientific advancements and the health care facilities that are now available. It is a boon or bane argument vary from country to country. But for india, it is bane. it should not go beyond 65 at last.
Comment Link
(Global Perspectives)
2 Stars
Agree
Yes, obviously. We can’t force anyone to die.
1 Stars
No, coz it's not life expectancy that is important but quality of life. with increase in life expectancy the quality of life has not increased. Health care changes need to be made but possibly addressing the changes that need to be made in the health care system are not more medicine and more easily attainable medicine but better wellness education.
0 Stars
Evan is right and i for one also think this is a quality of life issue, people of money can afford to prolong life in the wake of sickness, but it does not mean that they are extending the quality of their lives.
this rate is higher in the developed world but lower in the third world countries. I say if it comes with the quality of life I am for it.
this rate is higher in the developed world but lower in the third world countries. I say if it comes with the quality of life I am for it.
1 Stars
This has a common principle with inalienable rights to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. In the end, people seem to forget that LIFE is the first and foremost, yet it is sad that our society would rather prefers life be distributed according to wealth instead of being truly an inalienable right.
1 Stars
Agree
Yes, rich people are less likely to get crushed by a cement mixer because they're not working on construction sites, instead they sit behind desks.
the whole game is about opportunities. The government can't make everything truly equal for everyone. And What we should strive for is equal opportunity.
the whole game is about opportunities. The government can't make everything truly equal for everyone. And What we should strive for is equal opportunity.
1 Stars
Disagree
I would like to ask the very obvious question of how it is possible that a study which began two years ago could now be reporting the results that those participants who took statins lived an average of two years longer than those who did not take it?
Unless all participants not taking statins died at the outset of the study, and unless all those who did take statins died immediately upon its conclusion, the reported results simply do not make sense.
Unless all participants not taking statins died at the outset of the study, and unless all those who did take statins died immediately upon its conclusion, the reported results simply do not make sense.
1 Stars
Disagree
increasing population in the present time scenario and the rising life expectancy is adding fuel to the fire. i agree with bhagban for his logic that we can't force anyone to die. but we even could not put the problem aside. for if we talk about India it'll prove to be disastrous in the coming time.
1 Stars
Agree
Increaesd life expectancy is ina away a backlash on the logging up of age groups that fall into the non-productive bar and that is precisley the concern i think!
Local Opinions (3)
1 Stars
Agree
No, coz it's not life expectancy that is important but quality of life. with increase in life expectancy the quality of life has not increased. Health care changes need to be made but possibly addressing the changes that need to be made in the health care system are not more medicine and more easily attainable medicine but better wellness education.
1 Stars
Agree
This has a common principle with inalienable rights to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. In the end, people seem to forget that LIFE is the first and foremost, yet it is sad that our society would rather prefers life be distributed according to wealth instead of being truly an inalienable right.
1 Stars
Disagree
I would like to ask the very obvious question of how it is possible that a study which began two years ago could now be reporting the results that those participants who took statins lived an average of two years longer than those who did not take it?
Unless all participants not taking statins died at the outset of the study, and unless all those who did take statins died immediately upon its conclusion, the reported results simply do not make sense.
Unless all participants not taking statins died at the outset of the study, and unless all those who did take statins died immediately upon its conclusion, the reported results simply do not make sense.
Global Opinions (7)
2 Stars
Disagree
It is a bane...look at Finland today. The Finnish labor force is expected to begin declining by 2010. In 2015, about 20 per cent of Finns will be aged 65 or older, and this is one of the major reasons why the Finnish goverment is opening up its doors to foreign workers.
2 Stars
Agree
well it may seem the result of scientific advancements and the health care facilities that are now available. It is a boon or bane argument vary from country to country. But for india, it is bane. it should not go beyond 65 at last.
0 Stars
Disagree
Evan is right and i for one also think this is a quality of life issue, people of money can afford to prolong life in the wake of sickness, but it does not mean that they are extending the quality of their lives.
this rate is higher in the developed world but lower in the third world countries. I say if it comes with the quality of life I am for it.
this rate is higher in the developed world but lower in the third world countries. I say if it comes with the quality of life I am for it.
1 Stars
Agree
Yes, rich people are less likely to get crushed by a cement mixer because they're not working on construction sites, instead they sit behind desks.
the whole game is about opportunities. The government can't make everything truly equal for everyone. And What we should strive for is equal opportunity.
the whole game is about opportunities. The government can't make everything truly equal for everyone. And What we should strive for is equal opportunity.
1 Stars
Disagree
increasing population in the present time scenario and the rising life expectancy is adding fuel to the fire. i agree with bhagban for his logic that we can't force anyone to die. but we even could not put the problem aside. for if we talk about India it'll prove to be disastrous in the coming time.
1 Stars
Agree
Increaesd life expectancy is ina away a backlash on the logging up of age groups that fall into the non-productive bar and that is precisley the concern i think!
Agree (6)
2 Stars
well it may seem the result of scientific advancements and the health care facilities that are now available. It is a boon or bane argument vary from country to country. But for india, it is bane. it should not go beyond 65 at last.
(Global Perspectives)
2 Stars
Yes, obviously. We can’t force anyone to die.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
No, coz it's not life expectancy that is important but quality of life. with increase in life expectancy the quality of life has not increased. Health care changes need to be made but possibly addressing the changes that need to be made in the health care system are not more medicine and more easily attainable medicine but better wellness education.
(Local Perspectives)
1 Stars
Yes, rich people are less likely to get crushed by a cement mixer because they're not working on construction sites, instead they sit behind desks.
the whole game is about opportunities. The government can't make everything truly equal for everyone. And What we should strive for is equal opportunity.
the whole game is about opportunities. The government can't make everything truly equal for everyone. And What we should strive for is equal opportunity.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
This has a common principle with inalienable rights to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. In the end, people seem to forget that LIFE is the first and foremost, yet it is sad that our society would rather prefers life be distributed according to wealth instead of being truly an inalienable right.
(Local Perspectives)
1 Stars
Increaesd life expectancy is ina away a backlash on the logging up of age groups that fall into the non-productive bar and that is precisley the concern i think!
(Global Perspectives)
Disagree (4)
2 Stars
It is a bane...look at Finland today. The Finnish labor force is expected to begin declining by 2010. In 2015, about 20 per cent of Finns will be aged 65 or older, and this is one of the major reasons why the Finnish goverment is opening up its doors to foreign workers.
(Global Perspectives)
0 Stars
Evan is right and i for one also think this is a quality of life issue, people of money can afford to prolong life in the wake of sickness, but it does not mean that they are extending the quality of their lives.
this rate is higher in the developed world but lower in the third world countries. I say if it comes with the quality of life I am for it.
this rate is higher in the developed world but lower in the third world countries. I say if it comes with the quality of life I am for it.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
I would like to ask the very obvious question of how it is possible that a study which began two years ago could now be reporting the results that those participants who took statins lived an average of two years longer than those who did not take it?
Unless all participants not taking statins died at the outset of the study, and unless all those who did take statins died immediately upon its conclusion, the reported results simply do not make sense.
Unless all participants not taking statins died at the outset of the study, and unless all those who did take statins died immediately upon its conclusion, the reported results simply do not make sense.
(Local Perspectives)
1 Stars
increasing population in the present time scenario and the rising life expectancy is adding fuel to the fire. i agree with bhagban for his logic that we can't force anyone to die. but we even could not put the problem aside. for if we talk about India it'll prove to be disastrous in the coming time.
(Global Perspectives)
Add your Comment
Home


RSS 











